doubt
 - User
- Posts：158
Joined 2014-5-29
Last Visited 2019-09-18
|
|
All these super religious people that condemn same-sex but condone slavery and stoning women. Translate |
Floor reply (8)
-
I VOTED NO BECAUSE ITS MY MORAL OBLIGATION...THE IMMORAL CAN GO THE WAY OF SODOM AND GAMORRAH FOR ALL I CARE, THAT'S THEIR CHOICE. GOD CREATED ADAMN & EVE NOT ADAM & STEVE! EVEN PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND WOMAN IS GOOD, DOESN'T THROW THEM INTO THE CATEGORY OF BELIEVEING THEIR WOMAN SHOULD BE PUT IN SLAVERY AND STONES EITHER BY DEFAULT, SO KEEP YOUR JUDGEMENTS ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS TO YOURSELF AND JUDGE THE INDIVIDUAL HEARTS OF MEN ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS WOULD BE MORE FAIR THAN MAKING BLANKET STATEMENTS ABOUT OTHER GROUPS.
Translate
-
Reply shugars1974@gmail.com :I'm saying, don't pick and choose from your religious book to befit the needs or wants of yourselves. It's pathetic to see. You have a means to justify yourself by only saying "well the book says this isn't allowed". IT also says a lot of other things aren't allowed aswell. You are just using it as a "blanket statement" to swing your means of defence in regards to this type of topic.
Translate
-
Also, it isn't your "moral obligation". It's you detesting the potentiality for a more equal plane for everyone that plays games.
Here's a quick definitive direction for what "moral obligation" is in layman terms: " Generally speaking, when someone says of an act that it is a "moral obligation," they refer to a belief that the act is one prescribed by their set of values."
Translate
-
Prescribed: "state authoritatively or as a rule that (an action or procedure) should be carried out."
Oh my. That seems pretty forceful and direct. Seems extremely one sided too. Like...it's only meant to go for your views. Lets see what values are:
Translate
-
"In ethics, value denotes the degree of importance of something or action, with the aim of determining what actions are best to do or what way is best to live (deontology), or to describe the significance of different actions (axiology). It may be described as treating actions themselves as abstract objects, putting value to them. It deals with right conduct and good life, in the sense that a highly, or at least relatively highly, valuable action may be regarded as ethically "good" (adjective sense), and an action of low, or at least relatively low, value may be regarded as "bad". What makes an action valuable may in turn depend on the ethic values of the objects it increases, decreases or alters. An object with "ethic value" may be termed an "ethic or philosophic good" (noun sense)."
Huh. That's sounds a lot like "this is my personal disposition, if you don't agree with it you HAVE TO BE WHAT I SAY YOU ARE, OTHERWISE YOU'RE GOING AGAINST MY OPINION WHICH IS A BIG NONO."
Translate
-
Not to forget, you typed that in all caps. Like damn. You had to be mad, like damn. Someone not agreeing with your blank idea that's supposed to actively portray your feelings about something but really is a means to deter it by "picking and choosing the pretty things". Sit down.
Translate
-
Reply shugars1974@gmail.com : I'm sorry but I didn't see anything about fictional video game character marriages in the bible. It's just pixels.. If marriage is between man and a woman then between any pixel art couple shouldn't be allowed either. And it's just a little piece of code that defines male and female characters in the game.
Translate
-
Maybe you should Adam & Leave
Translate
-
|
Loading...
Search
Favorites
Post time 2014-8-17 02:25:25
Post time 2014-8-17 02:25:25 | 
Pls FIX Ahrodite, what a cultural insult making the strong mytic goodess look like a pink little doll. I did like the idea we should rescue angels and give love and light back to the land. This is not how it works. 
