North America Forum

 Forgot password?
 立即注册
Search

View: 603| Reply: 8

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

[Copy link]

29

Threads

100

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
ct67f
User
Posts:100
Joined 2015-4-19
Last Visited 2017-02-09
Post time 2015-11-12 17:52:06 | Show all posts |Read mode
A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers Reply:8| View:603
        I have been fortunate enough (and spent enough $$ & time) ;to build up a quad striking team.

        Level 80 Hunter, FQ, Lapsed, Chaos Paladin, Supreme Oracle and Moonlight Warlord backup. I have top level SS Totem with a 2nd Accursed & use a Horn prosperity for rage;
        I have 6.3M BR and regularly beat other players up to about 8M.

        I note that the ultra-top level players are all fielding def/support, like fame hunter & Sandlord instead of having more strikers. Usually a bulked up FQ to strike and;only Supreme oracle for rage, opting to have the main use a finishing skill like dragon fury to build rage.
        These players seem to have adopted a more modern approach rather than the old fashioned IRB.
        Is this now the premium type of build?
        Love to read your thoughts about whether I need to keep tinkering to improve or is the build I have right for my level & opponents?

        Thanks in advance.

 ct67f Last edit in 2015-11-12 17:52:06

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply

Use magic Report

0

Threads

4

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
akwaaak
User
Posts:4
Joined 2014-12-10
Last Visited 2015-10-28
Post time 2015-11-12 17:54:45 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers


better use main strike + FQ + sand lord and oracle and backup lapsed or moonlight only strikers sucks make some balance its really easy to kill someone with ur party not even need FQ or oracle or moonlight
Floor reply (0)

 akwaaak Last edit in 2015-11-12 17:54:45

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

35

Threads

240

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
raaz.adk
User
Posts:240
Joined 2014-6-17
Last Visited 2017-02-20
Post time 2015-11-12 19:17:19 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

Reply 1# akwaaak

        Well that build is for casher only coz ;i haven\'t seen anyone with LE skill used by free player. Since you have spent you can afford this build and it really is good build with buff from ;Sand lord, while rage feed is from main and LE/ MoD/ Oracle. This build is most suitable for strong PVP.
Floor reply (0)

 raaz.adk Last edit in 2015-11-12 19:17:19

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

6

Threads

661

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
king_of_kings
User
Posts:661
Joined 2015-1-26
Last Visited 2016-09-19
Post time 2015-11-12 20:34:57 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

        Well getting Rage is a lot easy now a days. The team u showed , most of them only need ;50 rage in average(If Main has TS etc). The only one need 75 will be LE/MOD/SO ;but u can place her on a SS,Divine totem etc and she will cast enough rage to give the stating rage for the whole team.;So no need for a 2nd rage giving hero. ;So the Old IRB is not needed now. rather its modified to a new version.
        The heros u will need are Sand Lord and Miya( Well its my opinion Only ) . U can replace CP and MW for those.
Floor reply (0)

 king_of_kings Last edit in 2015-11-12 20:34:57

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

4

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
akwaaak
User
Posts:4
Joined 2014-12-10
Last Visited 2015-10-28
Post time 2015-11-13 01:16:18 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

im a free player and i use light envoy mountain god silver dragon lord nereida and godless wolf and i can tell u i can kill guys with oracle sand lord and FQ i have some great battles againts cashers problem is i cant get MoD and Son Of Odin + Lapsed and silver queen and u dont need really great heroes to kill some high casher u just need tactic and the right things here in LoA most important its ur tactic if ur tactic its good u can kill one casher from 10 times 2 with just a simple party i know 2 its little but its still without paying bunch of cash
Floor reply (0)

 akwaaak Last edit in 2015-11-13 01:16:18

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

37

Threads

232

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
konjikiyaoi
User
Posts:232
Joined 2015-6-26
Last Visited 2016-11-14
Post time 2015-11-13 01:22:17 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

focus on hero compatibility with each other. an all red hero team can beat up an all gold hero team.
Floor reply (0)

 konjikiyaoi Last edit in 2015-11-13 01:22:17

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

57

Threads

891

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
s t r y d e r
User
Posts:891
Joined 2014-4-25
Last Visited 2016-03-14
Post time 2015-11-13 01:29:27 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers


        Replay to akwaaak
        yeah, SDL and Wolf won\'t out damage a good built FQ team same BR, NEVER NEVER NEVER. So the guys ur fighting r either dumb of have a weak ass FQ.;
Floor reply (0)

 s t r y d e r Last edit in 2015-11-13 01:29:27

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

36

Threads

470

Posts

0

Credits

User

Rank: 1

Credits
0
nodelborgos ed
User
Posts:470
Joined 2014-6-6
Last Visited 2016-12-01
Post time 2015-11-13 05:38:19 | Show all posts

A modern build - adding def/support vs strikers

Reply 6# s t r y d e r
+1
Floor reply (0)

 nodelborgos ed Last edit in 2015-11-13 05:38:19

 Support

Report
Default Signature
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register Now

Points Rules

小黑屋|community.gtarcade.com   

2017-2-21 06:21 GMT+8 , Processed in 0.183411 second(s), 45 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

To Top Return to the list